<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19725412.post258208151537289610..comments</id><updated>2010-01-23T16:20:38.584-06:00</updated><category term='impeachment'/><category term='voter id'/><category term='Dow Jones'/><category term='john mccain'/><category term='Feingold'/><category term='photos of murdered monks'/><category term='voting rights'/><category term='blog wars'/><category term='Afghanistan'/><category term='human rights'/><category term='Baldwin'/><category term='Election 2008'/><category term='smoker&apos;s rights'/><category term='Anti-Immigration'/><category term='Milwaukee Media'/><category term='spam filter'/><category term='Dead Kennedys'/><category term='AMA'/><category term='iraq'/><category term='patriotism'/><category term='Guantanamo Bay'/><category term='Go Vote'/><category term='DJIA'/><category term='Arizona'/><category term='fisa'/><category term='smoking ban'/><category term='Taylor'/><category term='GITMO'/><category term='training'/><category term='sexism'/><category term='social security'/><category term='entitlement programs'/><category term='sick gop'/><category term='clinton'/><category term='comment blocking'/><category term='aclu'/><category term='peaceful protest'/><category term='losing'/><category term='torch relay'/><category term='McGee'/><category term='sarah palin'/><category term='UNODC'/><category term='Garin'/><category term='human rights violations'/><category term='unemployment'/><category term='china'/><category term='race'/><category term='Iowa Caucus'/><category term='transgender rights'/><category term='AB390'/><category term='subtle racism'/><category term='Wexler'/><category term='sensenbrenner'/><category term='Michael Savage'/><category term='bush'/><category term='The White House Project'/><category term='tibetan protests'/><category term='GOP'/><category term='medicare'/><category term='environment'/><category term='event'/><category term='Wasserman'/><category term='barack'/><category term='Hillary'/><category term='Russ'/><category term='censorship'/><category term='Opium'/><category term='disability'/><category term='courts'/><category term='Heroin in the suburbs'/><category term='lgbt'/><category term='second chance act'/><category term='Butler'/><category term='Cheney'/><category term='health care rights'/><category term='witchcraft'/><category term='Obama'/><category term='felon enfranchisement'/><category term='domestic spying'/><category term='presidential primary'/><category term='Darling'/><category term='indiana'/><category term='felon disfranchisement'/><category term='Bhutto'/><category term='SCOTUS'/><category term='Dodd'/><category term='SRVS'/><category term='monks'/><category term='habeas corpus'/><category term='justice'/><category term='Opium DJIA Afghanistan'/><category term='Hate Speech'/><category term='Conyers'/><category term='tibetan monks'/><category term='brokered convention'/><category term='Ryan'/><category term='tibet'/><category term='Kucinich'/><category term='military commissions act'/><category term='Walker'/><category term='Local Elections'/><category term='Immigrants'/><category term='WI Supreme Court'/><title type='text'>Comments on Crawford's Take: Why the Roberts Decision Yesterday Was Correct (ev...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/feeds/258208151537289610/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/258208151537289610/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/2010/01/why-roberts-decision-yesterday-was.html'/><author><name>Crawford's Take</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01245128617020823714</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='24' src='http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/1943/1958/1600/Russ-Renee.2.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19725412.post-4479506915256510941</id><published>2010-01-23T16:20:38.584-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-23T16:20:38.584-06:00</updated><title type='text'>My goodness, an old-fashioned free speech liberal....</title><content type='html'>My goodness, an old-fashioned free speech liberal. I didn&amp;#39;t think they existed anymore. (And that&amp;#39;s meant as a compliment. Really. If the liberals hadn&amp;#39;t abandoned free speech starting in the &amp;#39;80s, I might have remained one.)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/258208151537289610/comments/default/4479506915256510941'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/258208151537289610/comments/default/4479506915256510941'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/2010/01/why-roberts-decision-yesterday-was.html?showComment=1264285238584#c4479506915256510941' title=''/><author><name>elliot</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15820148729023510413</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/2010/01/why-roberts-decision-yesterday-was.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19725412.post-258208151537289610' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/posts/default/258208151537289610' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-23072443'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19725412.post-6911313752550846500</id><published>2010-01-23T08:20:27.588-06:00</published><updated>2010-01-23T08:20:27.588-06:00</updated><title type='text'>More speech, including electioneering speech, is n...</title><content type='html'>More speech, including electioneering speech, is not always better. And you agree:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can you threaten a woman on free speech grounds? No.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yell &amp;quot;fire&amp;quot;? No.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Libel you as a serial murderer? No.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A UW-Madison law prof once told me he could name two situations where I would agree speech should not be free for every one that I could name where it should be free. He&amp;#39;s right.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Justice Stevens writes in dissent:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The real issue in this case concerns how, not if, the appellant may finance its electioneering. ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Neither Citizens United’s nor any other corporation’s speech has been &amp;#39;banned,&amp;#39; ... . All that the parties dispute is whether Citizens United had a right to use the funds in its general treasury to pay for broadcasts during the 30-day period. The notion that the First Amendment dictates an affirmative answer to that question is, in my judgment, profoundly misguided. Even more misguided is the notion that the Court must rewrite the law relating to campaign expenditures. ...&amp;quot;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/258208151537289610/comments/default/6911313752550846500'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/258208151537289610/comments/default/6911313752550846500'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/2010/01/why-roberts-decision-yesterday-was.html?showComment=1264256427588#c6911313752550846500' title=''/><author><name>MAL</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05503524741573516284</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='21' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_zciesOPE2zA/SxfoopQ0iLI/AAAAAAAABxI/w9g97FzWFcU/S220/mal.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.crawfordstake.com/2010/01/why-roberts-decision-yesterday-was.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19725412.post-258208151537289610' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/19725412/posts/default/258208151537289610' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-509152517'/></entry></feed>
